After a
couple of month hiatus from blogging on future planetary exploration (it's that
day job), I wanted to return by casting a wider net than normal for
topics. Today’s post accumulates a
number of news items and ideas that together suggest how rich the coming
decades of planetary exploration should be.
I’m
always looking for analogies that show how cheap planetary exploration really
is when you look at the big picture. To
each of us individually, $500 million, $1 billion, or $2 billion for a
planetary mission feels like an almost unimaginable amount of money. (I’m assuming few billionaires are read this blog.) A better way is to look at these costs
in the context of national economies.
NASA’s budget for planetary exploration for 2014, for example,
represents a trivial 0.008% of the US economy, or the equivalent of about $4 a
year for a family earning $51,000 (the US median family income) a year.
Okay,
that was a bit dry, so let’s look at a more fun analogy. Vox.com reports that this year, Americans spent
an estimated $350M on pet costumes for Halloween. If NASA had a similar amount each year to
spend on its cheapest class of missions (the Discovery program that has funded
missions to Mercury and the asteroids Vesta and Dawn among many destinations),
it could develop six to seven of these missions a decade instead of the two it
developed in the last decade.
The past
two months brought news of new planetary missions. India has announced that following the
success of its Mars Orbiter Mission currently at the Red Planet, it will launch
a follow up mission for 2018 after its second lunar mission to launch in
2016. Both the 2016 and 2018 missions
will include a lander and rover.
India’s
neighbor China also is planning for an ambitious planetary program. After four successful missions to the moon,
China has firm plans for at least one and possibly two lunar sample return
missions this decade. China has also
discussed plans for a Mars mission later this decade, but it appears that
nation’s ambitions are much wider ranging.
Chinese space scientists recently published a series of papers
describing their priorities across the fields of space science. The suggested
mission list for planetary exploration, broken into three stages, through
2030 is ambitious.
First
stage of missions
Mars
orbiter, lander, and rover
Space-based
mission to find near-Earth asteroids
Solar
Observatory
Second
stage of missions
Additional
Mars mission(s)
Venus
orbiter
Asteroid
Ceres sample return
Solar
polar observatory
Third
stage of missions
Mars
sample return
Jupiter
orbiter
China’s
lunar missions have shown that its engineers have the discipline and ability to
undertake an ambitious program. If China’s
leaders desire, they could fund this program (as I said above, on a national
scale planetary missions are affordable).
I suspect, though, that this represents the priority list of Chinese
scientists, much like the Decadal Survey represents the priority list of US
scientists. If the willingness of
Chinese politicians to fund planetary missions is similar to that of US
politicians, perhaps a third or a half of these missions will see serious
development by 2030. Even that fraction,
though, would make China a leading player in planetary exploration.
On this
list, I’d most like to see the Ceres sample return. We already know that this asteroid is an
rock-ice world different than any we've explored to date. I suspect that the
Dawn spacecraft will show how intriguing this world is when it arrives in 2015. China’s lunar sample missions will fill a big
hole that no other nation currently is addressing. China could fill a similar hole for Ceres,
while all the other missions on the list are similar to those already planned
by other space agencies (although at each world, there are always opportunities
to explore from a new angle).
Credit: NASA |
The next idea jumps from looking at
missions across the solar system to enabling micro missions at Mars. NASA is planning a Martian rover mission for
2020 that will duplicate the entry system of the Curiosity rover mission
currently on Mars. That entry system has
disposable weights that are ejected during the entry and landing process. NASA has issued a challenge to the planetary
science and engineering communities to suggest ideas how these could go from
dead weights to useful micro-missions.
NASA’s call for proposals states, “Proposed concepts should indicate
uses for ejectable mass up to 150 kg prior to Mars atmospheric entry and/or
another 150 kg during the entry and landing phases of the mission. NASA is
seeking concepts that expand scientific knowledge or technological capabilities
while exhibiting a high degree of practicality.”
A 150 kg is a lot to work with (although
volumes will be constrained). I’m really
intrigued to learn what creative ideas will be put forth. NASA expects to announce the winner this
January.
The Aviation Week and Space Technology
magazine reports that NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) and the Aerospace
Corporation are exploring a different concept, called MARSdrop, for piggy-back
Mars spacecraft. The idea is take
advantage of the wealth of spacecraft systems that have been developed for
CubeSats that use tiny form factors (as small as 10x10x10 cm) for
micro-satellites. In the Mars concept,
one or more 10 kg spacecraft would be released from a spacecraft approaching
Mars. Each MARSdrop spacecraft would
include its own atmospheric entry system and a triangular parachute called a
parawing to enable gliding to desired destinations. The landers would be small,
perhaps 10 kg, and the first will cost $20M to 50M to develop. The scientific payload would be small,
perhaps a video camera or multispectral imager, and the first lander would
likely be battery powered, limiting its lifetime to a few days.
The idea of small Mars missions seem to
be trending, with a Canadian team proposing the Northern Lights mission. The small lander would come with its own
instrument suite and arm and would also deploy a small rover that looks to be
about the size of the Mars Pathfinder’s Sojourner rover. The program’s web site doesn’t mention any
government funding – it appears that the team hopes to raise the few million
dollars it believes it needs through crowd sourcing. To me, carrying seven instruments and a rover
seems ambitious for first a private Mars mission. Just conducting a successful flight to Mars
and then surviving landing (remember that the similar-sized British Beagle 2 lander failed that
last test) to take a picture with the equivalent of a cellphone camera would be
an outstanding feat. Technology has
advanced to the point where micro Mars landers are conceivable; perhaps the
Northern Lights team will be the ones to pull it off. Their
website is worth a visit because I suspect that some team will put a lander
of this scale on Mars in the next two decades.
Each year, NASA solicits ideas for
exploration technologies that would push well beyond existing technologies to
enable missions that might fly in a decade or two. If these ideas can be made to work, the payback
could be enormous (although only a few if any will make it all the way from
inspiration to launch pad). This year’s list of funded concept studies was
rich in ideas for planetary exploration, and the following paragraphs provide a
sampling of the ones I found most intriguing.
So that you can get a flavor of the boldness and creativity of these
ideas, I’ll let the teams speak for themselves by quoting from their concept
summaries.
Credit: NASA Glenn Research Center |
Titan
Submarine: Exploring the Depths of Kraken – Titan’s seas are the
only surface oceans other than the Earth’s in the solar system. In the past, several teams have proposed
simple floating landers or diving bells to explore these oceans. The Titan Submarine concept, though, would “send
a submarine to Titan’s largest northern sea, Kraken Mare. This craft will
autonomously carry out detailed scientific investigations under the surface of
Kraken Mare, providing unprecedented knowledge of an extraterrestrial sea and
expanding NASA’s existing capabilities in planetary exploration to include in
situ nautical operations. Sprawling over some 1000 km, with depths estimated at
300 m, Kraken Mare is comparable in size to the Great Lakes and represents an opportunity
for an unprecedented planetary exploration mission.” The list of science goals is ambitious: to
study the “chemical composition of the liquid, surface and subsurface currents,
mixing and layering in the “water” column, tides, wind and waves, bathymetry,
and bottom features and composition.”
Credit: NASA, JPL |
Titan Aerial Daughtercraft – Balloons to drift across the skies of Titan are another idea with a long pedigree. One limitation of past proposals, though, is that they would have no way to land to conduct studies or collect samples. Similarly, proposed landers would be limited to studying the few square meters around them. The Titan Aerial Daughtercraft would be a less than 10 kg rotocoptor that would, “deploy from a balloon or lander to acquire close-up, high resolution imagery and mapping data of the surface, land at multiple locations to acquire microscopic imagery and samples of solid and liquid material, return the samples to the mothership for analysis, and recharge from an RTG [plutonium power system] on the mothership to enable multiple sorties… This concept is enabled now by recent advances in autonomous navigation and miniaturization of sensors, processors, and sampling devices. It revolutionizes previous mission concepts in several ways. For a lander mission, it enables detailed studies of a large area around the lander, providing context for the microimages and samples; with precision landing near a lake, it potentially enables sampling solid and liquid material from one lander. For a balloon mission, it enables surface investigation and sampling with global reach without requiring a separate lander or that the balloon be brought to the surface.”
Credit: John Hopkins University |
Using the Hottest Particles in the Universe to
Probe Icy Solar System Worlds – Many of the moons of the outer solar
system are believed to harbor oceans beneath their icy crusts. A key question for future missions will be
how thick those overlying crusts are.
Current methods require either power and data hungry and heavy ice
penetrating radar systems or prolonged measurements from orbit to measure tides
on the surface. One of this year’s
funded proposals would take an entirely new approach. The team proposes “to exploit a remarkable
confluence between methods from the esoteric world of high energy particle
physics and an application to delineate habitats suitable for life within the
solar system. PRIDE (Passive Radio Ice Depth Experiment) is a concept for an
innovative low cost, low power, low mass passive instrument to measure ice
sheet thickness on outer planet moons, such as Europa, Ganymede, and Enceladus,
some of which may harbor the possibility of life in under-ice oceans. The
proposed instrument, which uses experimental techniques adapted from high
energy physics, is a passive receiver of a naturally occurring signal generated
by interactions of deep penetrating cosmic ray neutrinos. It could measure ice
thickness directly, and at a significant savings to spacecraft resources. In
addition to getting the global average ice thickness this instrument can be
configured to make low resolution global maps of the ice shell. Such maps would
be invaluable for understanding planetary features and finding the best places
for future landers to explore.”
Credit: NASA, JPL |
Comet
Hitchhiker: Harvesting Kinetic Energy from Small Bodies to Enable Fast and
Low-Cost Deep Space Exploration – One of the primary limitations on our ability to explore the solar system is the amount of fuel a spacecraft can carry. One proposal would develop a system that would use the mass of small comets or asteroids as a substitute for fuel. “The comet hitchhiker concept is literally to hitch rides on comets to tour around the Solar System. This concept is implemented by a tethered spacecraft that accelerates or decelerates itself without fuel by harvesting kinetic energy from a target body. First, the spacecraft harpoons a target as it makes a close flyby in order to attach a tether to the target. Then, as the target moves away, it reels out the tether while applying regenerative brake to give itself a moderate (less than 5g) acceleration as well as to harvest energy.” The proposers provide two example of how this system could be used. “1. Fuel-less landing and orbit insertion. We estimate that a comet hitchhiker spacecraft can obtain up to ~10 km/s of delta-V by using a carbon nanotube (CNT) tether. This level of delta-V enables a spacecraft to land on/orbit around long-period comets and Kuiper belt objects (KBOs), which have not been even visited by any spacecraft yet. With existing technologies only a fly-by is realistic for these targets. 2. Non-gravitational slingshot around small bodies. A comet hitchhiker can obtain ~5 km/s of additional delta-V by utilizing just 25% of the harvested energy for reeling in the tether and/or driving electric propulsion engines. The tether is detached from the target after the desired delta-V is obtained. Our concept enables to design a fast trajectory to a wide range of destinations in the Solar System by taking full advantage of the high relative velocity, abundance, and orbital diversity of small bodies. For example, by hitching a comet with q=0.5 AU, a comet hitchhiker can reach the current orbital distance of Pluto (32.6 AU) in 5.6 years and that of Haumea (50.8 AU) in 8.8 years.”
Credit: Draper Laboratories |
Exploration
Architecture with Quantum Inertial Gravimetry and In Situ ChipSat Sensors – Sometimes a title
that seems to border on technobabble hides an exciting idea, or in this case, three. The summary on NASA’s web site doesn't help
much: “Through enabling
technologies, such as high-accuracy quantum, or cold-atom, inertial sensors
based on light-pulse atom interferometry (LPAI), and the extreme
miniaturization of space components into fully functional spacecraft-on-a-chip
systems (ChipSats), these combined missions can perform decadal-class science
with greatly reduced time scales and risk.” Draper Lab’s media relations department,
though, got the word out, and this idea received considerable press (see, for example,
here and here). This concept has
three parts. First, a CubeSat spacecraft
that might be the size of a loaf of bread would be designed that would be capable of interplanetary flight and
operations. Second, an
extremely miniaturized accelerometer (that’s the “high-accuracy quantum, or
cold-atom, inertial sensors”) would enable high resolution gravity measurements
of a planet or moon. Third, a flock of
tiny landers that are each a single computer chip would be released for surface
studies. Draper Labs concept image and
press released emphasized this concept as a way to explore Europa, which would
probably be about the most difficult target imaginable: high radiation that
kills electronics and little ability to add shielding to the tiny CubeSat or a ChipSats,
no meaningful atmosphere to allow the ChipSats to flutter to the surface safely, and a
distant sun that limits the effectiveness of solar panels. I will be interested to see if this team
releases further information on how they would deal with these challenges. However, the same approach could also be used
at Mars where the science potential is strong and the specific challenges of
Europa’s environment are absent. For
these technology development projects, teams sometimes will take on the most
difficult challenge to help force creative solutions.
Space limitations prevent me from
summarizing all the solar system concepts selected for funding this year. There are also concepts for testing the
ability of terrestrial plants to grow in a greenhouse on Mars, propel a
spacecraft quickly into interstellar space, and precisely measure the gravity
field and hence internal structure of asteroids and comets during brief
flybys. You can read the summaries of
these concepts and others addressing non-solar system exploration at this site.
While I have not been following the topic too closely, I very much like sample return missions – you mention "sample return" in a mission name, and I'm all in. However I haven't read anything so far on Ceres sample return missions, this is the first time (at least that I remember) that I have seen a mention of Ceres as a target. Out of curiosity: Why pick Ceres over e.g. Deimos or Phobos?
ReplyDeleteThe Chinese list of missions was the first time I'd seen a Ceres sample return. Both Russia and ESA are looking at sample return missions from Phobos and Demos (both separately and together as I understand it). Ceres is also an entirely different class of asteroid that is a rock-ice world that is neither traditional asteroid or traditional comet. A sample return could tell us a lot about the early formation of the solar system, and there's even a chance that life began when the Ceres ice was still water.
ReplyDeleteThe Titan Aerial Daughtercraft is a pretty old concept (Bob Zubrin had some ideas circa 1989). A rather detailed airplane drone implementation was sketched out by Ralph Lorenz (http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~rlorenz/bumblebee.pdf). I guess someone at JPL figured they could get NIAC funding to look at a quadcopter version of the same idea.
ReplyDeleteRalph certainly is the father of the idea of small drones on Titan (as he is for so many Titan exploration ideas), and Zubrin is perhaps the grandfather (didn't know about that connection). What I think is new in the Aerial Daughtercraft is the idea of repeat targetted landings and dockings both to exchange samples and to recharge the copter's batteries for reflight. From my understanding of the state of small drone/coptor robotics, this is pushing the technology but not in a big way. Anon, if you know more, please share.
ReplyDeleteThis link has a bit more information on the Daughtercraft idea: http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/ippw2014/pdf/8083.pdf
Honoured to see the Canadian Northern Light mission to Mars included in your round up! Would love to chat more and answer any questions your readers may have about our plans.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.indiegogo.com/projects/northern-light-mission-to-mars/x/8890766
@Tony:
ReplyDeleteMy understanding is that Phobos (and possibly Deimos) have a past as debris from an impact event on Mars (Phobos is very low density, in a fully circularized decaying orbit). Studying them could tell us about Hadean Mars and also about NEOs/Trojans that are often assemblages of space-flotsam.
Ceres, by contrast, is in a whole class of planet like Callisto - Small, icy, differentiated. Knowing more about it may help solve the missing water problem of Hadean Earth, and prepare us for exploration of the icy moons of J/S/U.
The delta-V for sample return is pretty low, too -- China is still relying on the Proton for their heavy launches (I think?) and I suspect the Chinese scientists' white papers were constructed with 'certain constraints.'
I always try to take a long, budget-constrained view of planetary explo, so I tell myself something like, "Okay, by 2054 what do you want to see done, realistically?"
ReplyDeleteSo, with that 40 year window I'd like to look back and have seen Mars Sample Return, network landers, and advanced data relay, a la the aborted Telecom Orbiter. Beyond that for Mars I'd hope that private enterprise advances to point that we have commercial rovers offering 8K virtual reality tours for us back on Earth.
Elsewhere, I'd like to see some variation of a Europa Multi-Flyby, then an eventual lander (I think submersible is a bridge too far for within next 40 years), a Saturn-Titan-Encleadus System Mission, and a Neptune Orbiter with Triton lander or impactor (not holding my breath for latter).
Am going to assume all Outer Planets missions will be international affairs.
There is also the idea for a Jupiter trojan sample return with solar sails from Jaxa
ReplyDeletehttps://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jsts/27/1/27_1_1/_article
PRIDE is shockingly innovative. I'm obviously now for any particle physics missions. I'm for whatever will scale up Starshade now that I view the Drake Equation as a priority. And the Dark Streak and Enceladus. VASIMR looks good as do any missions that use gravitons.
ReplyDeleteNice to see China in the mix. Hope Canada joins them when we get an astronaut Cabinet Minister.
...it is my thesis that arid world are more likely to originate malevolent civilizations and worlds with more coastline are more likely to originate a species that has/will experience a Scottish Enlightenment and Ionian Greece.
ReplyDeleteI generally was a Rare Earther until this fall. If we see atmospheric evidence of two civilizations 100 light years away in either direction, and one world is wetter than the other, if we only have one spaceprobe/craft, we should focus our first contact activities upon the drier world.
I'd like to know how large the Starshade occulter will potentially scale. Can we make it big enough to image all planetary atmospheres within 10000 light years?
The New Year's Discover and Scientific American issues were shockingly good. Discover discussed the first alien worlds Star Shade might find. It posited white dwarf stars and bigger planets will be easiest to see or find. It discussed gravity induced weathering and the topography of a coastline. Discover stated that since gravity would be stronger, the alien world would be flatter, having longer effective shorelines than would otherwise be. But a bigger world would also have more plate tectonics. If so, there would be more mountain forming forces. There would be more Lake Baikal's, more Challenger Depths...I'd suspect the water bodies would be deeper. Better able to moderate a nuclear winter, for instance. I'm not sure which effect is more, but I'd guess the greater mountin forming processees lead to a surface like Japan, and the Himalayas, and not Aegean Greece, despite the extra gravity.
ReplyDeleteSo we shopuld expect to find atmospheric characteristics of deeper water bodies, if mountain forming forces overcome the greater gravity...the age of the planet may be key here.
And FTR our brains are less angry than their's were without technology. If my WMD/tyranny sensor network breaks, a contingency to halt R+D (I assume they mean only the risky stuff) should be developed. I'm optimistic that existing brainwave sensors can outperform paper tests, and they aren't far behind expert analysis on a USA military volunteer paper I'm finishing. I lump this here because we cannot send potentially WMD enacting engineering technologies like colonies too far if the good gvmt isn't there.