Pawel G., one of this blog's readers, sent me two links to sites the describe Russia's planetary ambitions. I don't read Russian (those Russian classes in college a few decades ago went to waste I guess). I believe that these are wish lists much as various scientific communities in the United States draw up lists of missions they'd like to see fly. I doubt that Russia has or will budget the funding for more than a few of these. If any you know differently, please let me know.
The first website, http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=257249, per what I could gleam using Google translate, discusses a list of missions of which Phobos-Grunt and Venera-D I believe are approved (the former is largely built). Grunt in Russian reportedly means 'soil,' so the grunt missions below are probably sample return missions.
Luna-Glob (two)
Luna-Grunt
Lunar Ground
Phobos-Grunt
Mars Aster
Mars Primer
Venera-D
Asteroid-Grunt
Comet-Grunt
Europe-Penetrator
Jupiter-Ganymede
Gipersat (Saturn-Hyperion-Iapetus)
Obertur (Uranium-Oberon-Titania)
Netra (Neptune-Triton)
The second presentation, http://www.novosti-kosmonavtiki.ru/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=8434, appears to be from a conference and is partially in Russian and partially in English. This presentation lays out the engineering approach to enabling a number of missions. In this approach, standard modules such as in insertion module, a cruise module (also shown with landing legs, so perhaps the science platform module might be a better description), and a sample return module would be combined for different missions.
Editorial Thoughts:
It's good to see Russia returning to planetary exploration. The idea of modular spacecraft stacks is intriguing, and might be key to enabling a number of missions while holding down costs.
No comments:
Post a Comment